3 ms·
The Craig Murray graph is completely misleading. It was not generated by Murray, it was generated by Wikipedia, and Murray apparently saw it, misunderstood it,
by throwaway81523 6y ago
The Craig Murray graph is completely misleading. It was not generated by Murray, it was generated by Wikipedia, and Murray apparently saw it, misunderstood it, flipped out, and put it on his own site. It is discussed rather thoroughly in the Wikipedia proceedings. It doesn't mean anything like what it looks like. Of course generating the misleading graph is Wikipedia's fault, but it was intended for something else altogether.
- pydry 6y agoIs there a link to this discussion somewhere that disproves the notion that the account is a 9-5 editing machine?
- Kim_Bruning 6y agoIt was actually technically findable with links presented in this HN discussion, but I've dug down to the relevant bit to save you some time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP_issues_on_British_politics_articles/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_173.228.123.166_(talk) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests...
- pydry 6y agoSomebody is definitely downplaying him here. Im not seeing any data to support that though.
- throwaway81523 6y agoDisproves? It's a stupid premise to begin with. But yes, you can look at the account's editing history. There is a timestamp on every edit. It is nothing like how Murray imagined.