4 ms·
Based on what you wrote, I agree with RHSeeger that you did indeed make that assumption. That you can’t see it speaks volumes about your analysis not matching t
by irq 6y ago
Based on what you wrote, I agree with RHSeeger that you did indeed make that assumption. That you can’t see it speaks volumes about your analysis not matching the facts.
- raspasov 6y agoStill no answer to my question about definition of "access to wealth". It's like "access to God", for what I know.
- irq 6y agoI don’t see how your unanswered question relates to RHSeeger’s statement, but your transparent attempt to deflect by continuing to bring it up, again, says more about the flaws in your thought process than it achieves your aim.
- raspasov 6y agoThe unanswered question is half of the statement. One part: "wealth", another part: "access to wealth".