6 ms·
More technical rebuttal is here http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2021/03/guest-post-problems-with-eric.html?m=1 http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2021/03/guest-p
by Google234 5y ago
More technical rebuttal is here http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2021/03/guest-post-problems-with-eric.html?m=1 http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2021/03/guest-post-problems...
- XorNot 5y agoNotably: > In these interviews, Weinstein laments that the scientific community is dismissive of GU because he has not released a technical paper, but insists that scientists should be able to understand the substantive content of GU from the lecture alone This is alarm bells territory. There's nothing there.
- mr_mitm 5y agohttps://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html Baez should update this list to include: 20 points for publishing your theory only on YouTube.
- Rochus 5y ago23 years old typo in point 8: "Einstien"
- rrobukef 5y agoThat's not a typo.
- Rochus 5y agoWhy not? The author demonstrated that he could write the name correctly otherwise in the text.
- semigroupoid 5y agoAll the names in point 8 are misspelled, that’s the point.
- Rochus 5y agoOk, I see; obviously not my kind of humor.
- mr_mitm 5y agoYou actually almost fit point 20 now: > 20 points for emailing me and complaining about the crackpot index. (E.g., saying that it "suppresses original thinkers" or saying that I misspelled "Einstein" in item 8.)
- Rochus 5y agoStill waiting for my 20 points.