> Every time I read one of PG's posts, it seems like he's working from a narrative that he's trying to conform facts to. PG has been a cheerleader for VC backe

> Every time I read one of PG's posts, it seems like he's working from a narrative that he's trying to conform facts to. PG has been a cheerleader for VC backed capitalism for a while, which has produced both anodyne and strained articles alike. I think the more interesting question after an article like this one is this: does he actually believe this stuff?