4 ms·
Even if you bother to read the small print, it appears to be written to be deliberately misleading. Instead of positively saying that one enters an annual commi
by DominikPeters 5y ago
Even if you bother to read the small print, it appears to be written to be deliberately misleading. Instead of positively saying that one enters an annual commitment, it only says that there is "No annual commitment required after the first year". "Cancel anytime" suggests you can stop your contract, not that you have the option to pre-pay the remaining months and forfeit your access.
- dmingod666 5y agoCorrect, it's misleading if you chose to ignore the words "after the first year".
- shawnz 5y agoIf four words alone can change the entire meaning then I would say that is likely to mislead people. I am sure you can agree they didn't do their best in making the nature of the contract as clear as possible here.
- DominikPeters 5y ago“No annual commitment required after the first year” does not logically imply that there is such a commitment for the first year.