Usually I find his articles entertaining, sometimes thought-provoking. This one is none of these. I've commented my own objections, read others'. What strikes

Usually I find his articles entertaining, sometimes thought-provoking. This one is none of these. I've commented my own objections, read others'. What strikes me is that this article was proof-read by (the usual) people, and no one realised it will blow up on HN. That smells a bubble in which PG/YC is.