3 ms·
It possibly has, at least at an effective rate (by not raising salaries while inflation increases, for example). The CEO, though, is just one person and it's e
by t-writescode 6y ago
It possibly has, at least at an effective rate (by not raising salaries while inflation increases, for example).
The CEO, though, is just one person and it's easy to pay a single person a lot of money.
In a company of 100,000 people, an extra $5,000,000 would only increase their salaries by 50 each; but, it could all go to the CEO and look gigantic.
- superjan 6y agoI heard that argument before, but we don’t know what the layers in between look like. The higher you are, the more growth you can claim responsibility for, and demand a piece of the pie accordingly.