> Swift is talking about "music" as an original work. Patel responds with an irrelevant point about digital copies of music. No one wants Swift's music as an o

> Swift is talking about "music" as an original work. Patel responds with an irrelevant point about digital copies of music. No one wants Swift's music as an original work; that doesn't even make sense, because it's not possible to retroactively make someone else the creator of given song. They want digital copies of Swift's music, the thing that is not scarce.