3 ms·
This isn't the intent being referred to. They aren't referring to "intent to violate copyright law". If your intent is to comment on Shakespeare, and it happen
by drdeca 6y ago
This isn't the intent being referred to. They aren't referring to "intent to violate copyright law".
If your intent is to comment on Shakespeare, and it happens that what you produced, when run through some process, produces something under copyright, but the thing you intended to express doesn't, I don't think that would violate copyright law? Or at least, no one would convict you.
- drdeca 6y agoAlso, my understanding is that if you can prove that your creation of something was independent of someone else’s creation of the same thing, it isn’t a copyright violation?