> In 1982, 84% of the richest 100 people got rich by inheritance, extracting natural resources, or doing real estate deals. Is that really better than a world i

> In 1982, 84% of the richest 100 people got rich by inheritance, extracting natural resources, or doing real estate deals. Is that really better than a world in which the richest people get rich by starting tech companies? Google, Facebook, Amazon are extracting human resources. More precisely they are exploiting it. Which one is better? Doesn't matter. Once something is exploited it will disappear.