Ah, no no no. Oh, God, what have I done!? What I wanted to indicate was firstly, as a physical speculation the possibility of a universal field in the sense o

Ah, no no no. Oh, God, what have I done!? What I wanted to indicate was firstly, as a physical speculation the possibility of a universal field in the sense of the quantum field theory, which shows additional dimensionality with breaking of its symmetry in hierarchical levels and thus there is in a certain sense only one thing, the universal field. Secondly, the question when something is considered as an independent 'thing', which is a philosophical question. Third, the question of the interpretation of the relation of mathematical apparatus and reality. What does the dimensionality of the mathematical model mean? A scientific-theoretical question. And the gluons of this all are just linguistics and semantics. ;-)))