There are relative winners and outright beneficiaries of climate change. There was study/map projecting mortality per 100k, with some countries gaining life. Sa

There are relative winners and outright beneficiaries of climate change. There was study/map projecting mortality per 100k, with some countries gaining life. Same with GDP/development. And with geopolitics, someone benefits from neighbors water wars, destabilizing regions with climate refugees etc. Or that global south projected to be most vulnerable but are also least developed and most incentivized to pollute their way into development. There are too many competing interests and contradictions for global warming to be taken universally seriously, or at least seriously as scientists thinks it needs to be.