3 ms·
> almost as dishonest, even if it's not saying he defended Epstein: "Famed Computer Scientist Richard Stallman Described Epstein Victims As 'Entirely Willing'".
by Udik 5y ago
> almost as dishonest, even if it's not saying he defended Epstein: "Famed Computer Scientist Richard Stallman Described Epstein Victims As 'Entirely Willing'".
Why "almost"? It's false, and clearly so for anyone who has the literacy needed to write that piece. It's entirely dishonest.
- jraph 5y agoDid you read "almost as dishonest" as "almost dishonest"?
- Udik 5y agoNo, I read it as "somewhat less dishonest". But since anyone who is able to read and understand English at a high school level knows that "presented herself as entirely willing" means something different from "was entirely willing", both statements ("defends Epstein" and "says she was entirely willing") are deliberately stating complete falsehoods. Which is entirely dishonest.
- meowface 5y agoYou're right; I probably should have said "almost as destructive". They're equally dishonest. I just think "defends Epstein" is even more of an insult, even if they're both awful.