5 ms·
Assuming they won't notice that is probably not the right way to go. Also, 22@ might be a little high. Just sayin'
by borski 15y ago
Assuming they won't notice that is probably not the right way to go.
Also, 22@ might be a little high. Just sayin'
- iqster 15y agoHeh ... I wonder why they didn't multiply by 7 (rather than 11)? The frequency counts would have been the same as rolling two dice. Too obvious perhaps? Or maybe that would have attracted the wrong sort of developers :-p
- Dn_Ab 15y agoArdent monopoly fans? heh. I not particularly skilled in javascript but surely multiplying by 7 would return a number between 0 and 6 inclusive? Which is much more like rolling two 7 sided dice numbered from 0 which yields a different value in the pattern.
- iqster 15y agoCatan fans and craps shooters ;) Oops ... off by 1 again ... story of my life :p