Just because it has a secondary reason of interest, it doesn't negate the original intent (especially when the original intent has been documented by the author

Just because it has a secondary reason of interest, it doesn't negate the original intent (especially when the original intent has been documented by the author). I doubt this would stand up if legally challenged. Primes are pretty dense in the integers - unless you're going to say 'data can't be illegal' - including e.g. CP, then highlighting illegal primes is simply not a valid evasion.