4 ms·
I wouldn't go that far as calling it impossible, but it sure is crufty and quirky seen with modern eyes. My "favorite" (i.e. most terrifying) BASH fact is this
by gspr 6y ago
I wouldn't go that far as calling it impossible, but it sure is crufty and quirky seen with modern eyes.
My "favorite" (i.e. most terrifying) BASH fact is this: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/121013/how-does-linux-deal-with-shell-scripts https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/121013/how-does-lin...
- codetrotter 6y agoInteresting that the answer to that question names the file as .bash – I do this too, but I didn’t know anyone else did. I do this because my shell scripts use bash specific features, and I want to distinguish them from portable shell scripts that use POSIX shell features only. The latter being the only files that really deserve being named as .sh in my eyes :)