3 ms·
> They place letters that are pressed in direct succession apart, ... and that really reduces typing speed. When i switched to dworak I was amazed how my finge
by Andrew_nenakhov 6y ago
> They place letters that are pressed in direct succession apart,
... and that really reduces typing speed. When i switched to dworak I was amazed how my fingers just roll on a keyboard, forming sentences faster than I even form a conscious understanding in which succession should I move my fingers. It just happens as if by itself!! Just think of a word to type and it is already on the screen.
- Xylakant 6y ago> ... and that really reduces typing speed. That may be the effect for you, but it's not a goal. It's maybe a tradeoff, but machine writing is a trainable craft. Usual results for trained people are at about 200 - 400 characters per minute measured over 10 minutes. Championship results are at up to 900 characters.
- Andrew_nenakhov 6y agoYeah, and all championship results are on Dvorak keyboards. [1] [1]: http://www.recordholdersrepublic.co.uk/world-record-holders/43/barbara-blackburn.aspx http://www.recordholdersrepublic.co.uk/world-record-holders/...
- Aengeuad 6y agoThere are plenty of unofficial records and leader boards for typing speeds where qwerty typists are just as capable (more so even due to sheer availability) as Dvorak typists at hitting 200+wpm, and while that alone shouldn't be used to judge the quality of a particular layout it shouldn't be ignored that there's no difference in attainable max speeds done in short bursts. That says nothing about sustained typing of course, but I strongly suspect if you're already a competent and fast typist in qwerty you'll be comparably as fast in Dvorak and vice versa.