5 ms·

I'm not sure I understand you enough to make judgements according to this. "Stand down and stand by" could be inciting violence, I think. So, no, we didn't see

by avmich 6y ago

I'm not sure I understand you enough to make judgements according to this. "Stand down and stand by" could be inciting violence, I think. So, no, we didn't seem to go back to absolute fundamentals enough to have this question closed. It's unclear. As soon as we have the theater case - perhaps any exception - it becomes more complex, and I didn't see enough clarifications, with all my good intents.

paulryanrogers 6y ago
Sorry if I was unclear myself. While the boundaries on free speech are important, they don't seem so vague to me. At least in the case of violence it's been tested in the courts. And what appear to be intentionally vague statements or encoded messages could be attempts to exploit uncertainty. With the goal being to incite violence without directly saying "if I lose storm the capital by force".