3 ms·
Ask HN: Visible Comment Scores - My Biggest Problem
Okay, I know.. showing/not-showing comment votes has been rehashed in at least a few front-page posts at this point.. but there's one effect that I feel hits me the hardest with the not-showing-votes change and I'm not seeing it talked about. So, I'm wondering if I'm alone.
Bottom line is that since the display of comment votes was suppressed, I feel like the inertia of early comments is too strong. In summary, I believe there is psychology behind voting on comments whose scores you're aware of that allows users to evaluate the proximity of a comment's score to the 'right' score for that comment.. as opposed to making just a boolean thumbs-up or thumbs-down decision on whether the comment is good or bad without relative context. It's flawed.. the point of the scores are to seqeunce the comments, so not being able to see the scores leaves the reader without any context for making a decision.
Here's how it affects me: I visit the comment thread on a post early-on. Maybe there's 6-20 comments, I get a sense for how the discussion is going and if the story is interesting to me I often want to revisit later to see what people have to say. Since comment scores were suppressed, I'm sure that the likelihood that the comments at the top of the list are much less likely to have changed. That is to say, there's a greater weight now placed on commenting early, and it's hurting the ability for voting to reflect the quality of the comments in the thread. I'd expect a system to stabilize and for the comments scores to become more useful and relevant over the life of the thread, not to begin polarizing in the very beginning of the thread's life. I think this is the biggest fault of the comment score change, and the reason it ought to be undone.
It ought to be provable. I'd posit that if you were to look at timestamps of comments before and after the change you'd find that it's now much more likely for comments with very early dates to appear at the top of the list than later ones...
That said, I feel like if I'm gonna complain I ought to provide an alternative. The comment scores are hidden for a reason, so what would I replace them with? I'm not sure. I've seen or imagined a couple of things that I think are worth trying. One is to quantize the displayed comment score.. "0,1,5,10,20,50,100" or something. That's an interesting idea. Another thought that intrigues me is to weight the comments score by the karma of the scorer.. giving well-respected user's more say in the value of a comment. I wonder if a combination of the two might help us arrive at the 'best' display of compelling comments the fastest.
At any rate. </diatribe>
- kinkora 15y agoAgree with showing visible comment scores, disagree with karma of a scorer adding more weight to comment scores. Ok first the agreement. When I was a non-member of HN, I use to skim through the comment thread and pick out good comments based on the score and most of the times, the HN community was great at identifying the best comments (Key phrase = "most of the times"). Then the scores were removed and I found myself regularly having to sift through the comment thread cause, like what the OP says, the top comments are more than likely the people who commented the earliest on the thread. In a comment thread where you have at least 30+ comments, you do sometimes find some interesting comments in the middle of the thread but again, without comment scores, I have to go through every one of them to pick out what is good or not. I would more than likely not be bothered if the thread had 100+ comments unless I'm absolutely interested in that topic or if it had comment scores. As for your solution, I disagree with the bigger the karma of the scorer = the more points is added to a comment score. I've seen this before in a particular forum and what I noticed was that users will start "blindly" agreeing or pandering to users with high karma just to get them to vote on their comment. I.e. If pg disagrees with say climate control, and a topic comes up in regards to that, you'll more likely see the comment thread heavily gravitating towards pg's views. Basically, what I am saying is that, doing this may result in a lot of comments being partial towards a user with high karma points if he/she participates in that comment thread.