3 ms·
Going off of the quoted bit because I haven't watched the video, he isn't necessarily suggesting that is the mode of action, just that the mechanism of Valium d
by nvrspyx 6y ago
Going off of the quoted bit because I haven't watched the video, he isn't necessarily suggesting that is the mode of action, just that the mechanism of Valium does both. The mention of GABA enhancement from the comment above alludes to that.
Behavior and attitude can influence each other. For example, happiness makes you smile, but smiling can also make you happy (to some degree). The same works for anxiety in which your mental anxiety can make you physically anxious and vice versa. What he is suggesting here, especially considering the James-Lange mention, is that Valium's mode of action is targeting the behavior side of things for anxiety, but does not exclude it from influencing more than just muscle tension.
I think the general consensus in psychology is that it's neither the mental state nor the physical state (James-Lange) that create emotion, but rather both. Both can instigate responses from each other. Valium simply influences part of the CNS to affect both, but because it's a drug, it inherently affects the "physical state" more directly.
Normal muscle relaxants aren't as effective for anxiety as Valium because they don't have any action on the central nervous system, just the neuromuscular mechanisms. Valium does much more than simply relax muscles. It affects GABA throughout the whole body.
- h0l0cube 6y ago> Normal muscle relaxants aren't as effective for anxiety as Valium because they don't have any action on the central nervous system, just the neuromuscular mechanisms. Valium does much more than simply relax muscles. It affects GABA throughout the whole body. Thanks for clarifying on this. A lot of people seem to think it's okay to just down-vote without providing some sort of counterpoint. I might be naive on a topic, but that's an opportunity to correct, not punish.
- nvrspyx 6y agoAgreed. I'm of the stance that I only downvote trolling or absurd claims without any form of supporting details. Otherwise, I prefer to take the route of elaborating/correcting/questioning/etc even if I'm not an expert on the subject because then it at least fosters a discussion and sets up a path for shorter corrective comments from those that don't have the time/motivation/energy to respond in more detail.
- h0l0cube 6y agoI rarely make the mistake of speaking with certainty about something I'm not sure of, so I guess the down votes were warranted. But I am surprised that a tenured professor at an elite university would be so wrong in his area of expertise. A cursory googling shows that there has been some decent research on muscle relaxation as a mechanism to reduce anxiety, though I concede that Diazepam probably has higher order effects that compound is efficacy: https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=muscle+relaxation+anxiety&btnG= https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=m...