56 ms·
Well, attacking a nuclear plant is considered everywhere as "nuclear terrorism".
by rq1 6y ago
Well, attacking a nuclear plant is considered everywhere as "nuclear terrorism".
- ars 6y agoNever mind the nuclear part, it's not terrorism either. Terrorism implies a civilian target. A military facility for producing nuclear weapons is definitely not a civilian target.
- rq1 6y agoYou should just accept your ambivalence and hypocrisy. It’s really hard to be on the bad side against such an awful theocracy, but you made it, congrats.
- ars 6y agoI'm confused, how am I on the bad side against Iran? Iran falsely claimed something as Nuclear Terrorism, when it's neither of those things - that would put me on the good side against them, not the bad.
- ALittleLight 6y agoI think most people would assume nuclear terrorism involved nuclear or radioactive weapons, not an attack on a nuclear power plant.
- witherk 6y agoIs it? I would have assumed that use of nuclear weapon would be needed for nuclear terrorism. The idea of 'nuclear terrorism' puts a very different picture in my head than this. If someone dropped a nuclear bomb 'Equation Group' of the NSA would you call that a 'cyber terrorism'.