3 ms·

I'm not sure why this is downvoted other than maybe because of the assertion that the statement is irrelevant? As I understand it, you're right on that. Althou

I'm not sure why this is downvoted other than maybe because of the assertion that the statement is irrelevant? As I understand it, you're right on that. Although it makes me wonder - if he DID have a lethal dose, why are they even bothering with this? Seems like it would weaken the case because it's such flimsy evidence.

totalZero 6y ago
It's an assertion of something as fact that has been disputed in the case. That's why it's downvoted. Also, the word "fatal" implies causality but a fentanyl user can take a dose that would kill a non-user, and survive. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/08/us/george-floyd-fentanyl-toxicologist.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/08/us/george-floyd-fentanyl-...
- listless 6y ago
  Thank you!