2 ms·
I know it's not a popular term in the U.S. but the socialist answer would be that companies serve the public and should therefore make information freely availa
by contravariant 6y ago
I know it's not a popular term in the U.S. but the socialist answer would be that companies serve the public and should therefore make information freely available unless there's a good reason not to.
For the same reason companies shouldn't get to keep or distribute information on the very people they're supposed to be serving (unless there's a good reason to).
So rather than transparency increasing with power, you could also say that the lack of transparency itself is placing powers in the exact opposite place of where it should be.
- clairity 6y agothat's viewed with skepticism because it presumes, or at least implies, that socialism inherently and structurally solves the transparency problem, but it still requires similar policy to augment the underlying ideology appropriately. there's no free lunch when it comes to some (usually small) proportion of people trying to leverage a system.