3 ms·
> It can destroy those sites easily enough if it needs to. Is it as simple as that? (1) There is a continuum from dirty bombs to full Nukes that makes it a bi
by Paddywack 5y ago
> It can destroy those sites easily enough if it needs to.
Is it as simple as that?
(1) There is a continuum from dirty bombs to full Nukes that makes it a bit more messy.
(2) Are Nukes not more "hideable" than this? For example, why has NK not had theirs bombed?
- baybal2 5y ago> For example, why has NK not had theirs bombed? Because of a country up north.
- yongjik 5y ago> > For example, why has NK not had theirs bombed? > Because of a country up north. ...and another country down south as well. There are fifty million citizens of a country officially allied with America who would appreciate not having a nuclear war next door, thank you very much.
- pygar 5y agoThe size of the sites they need to make the nukes are not small. It's more a matter of Intellegence knowing whats going on there. The issue with NK, to my understading, is that any action there would lead to SK ( A densely populated country) being attacked with a lot regular missiles that would be hard to prevent.