10 ms·
Not really. Coordination takes resources, doesn't scale and increases the risk of human error. A predefined set of rules making encounters predictable are way b
by Gwypaas 6y ago
Not really. Coordination takes resources, doesn't scale and increases the risk of human error. A predefined set of rules making encounters predictable are way better. Like we have done for ships [0] and aircraft [1]. Any time you have to actively communicate with the other party you have not made your intentions clear enough.
I.e. a transferring satellite gives way to an operational which gives way to a disabled. (Of course it's more involved than this, including predictable avoidance maneuvers, but that's would be the basic gist of it.)
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Regulations_for_Preventing_Collisions_at_Sea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Regulations_for_...
[1] https://planefinder.net/about/visual-flight-rules-vfr-of-the-air/ https://planefinder.net/about/visual-flight-rules-vfr-of-the...
- bryanlarsen 6y agoAFAICT NASA and SpaceX already have such an agreement, and is basically that the NASA satellite will hold steady and the SpaceX one will maneuver.