4 ms·
Ah yes. Because cryptocurrencies exist in a vacuum and are entirely independent of anything else in a country. Including people's ability to buy them (and no, I
by dmitriid 6y ago
Ah yes. Because cryptocurrencies exist in a vacuum and are entirely independent of anything else in a country. Including people's ability to buy them (and no, I'm not talking about prohibitions on buying).
Besides, let me quote you to you. Emphasis mine:
"""
Being under a country's jurisdiction also seems to give the project legal accountability. I really wish this project success, and hope everything they do is audited properly to prevent corruption.
"""
Oh, look, cryptocurrencies are running into a real worl now. The project needs those "corrupt politicians, judges, lawyers, economists etc." to provide it with jurisdiction, legal accountability and auditing.
- hereme888 6y agoNo my friend, if a crypto project is audited by the founders, an independent team, and a government team, all in initial agreement, there should be no way for corruption at a later time to change it. That's what I'm talking about. Don't go mixing corrupt people with the non-corrupt.
- dmitriid 6y agoAh yes. Everyone is corrupt, except the cryptocurrency saints. Notice how you still need: - jurisdiction (provided by "corrupt people") - legal accountability (your words, not mine. Laws are provided by the very same "corrupt people") - auditing (the laws and processes of an audit are also written by the very same "corrupt people")