2 ms·

I thought you were saying you thought signal had been three-letter compromised and you were continuing to use it, which seemed inconsistent. Now understand you

I thought you were saying you thought signal had been three-letter compromised and you were continuing to use it, which seemed inconsistent. Now understand you meant some tin-foil hatters think it was compromised, but you don't. That makes sense. (I also find the "it's a signal they're compromised" theory absurd).

hardwaresofton 6y ago
Well someone brought it up, and I thought it was an interesting tin foil hat theory -- It could have happened, I'm not sure what to make of that. I can also probably say at this point I don't care enough to really do something about it. Personally the code being F/OSS is enough for me -- if I need to run my own instance of the server then I could, and if the many-eyes theory holds true and signal's security audit is any good, then I'm pretty happy with that. I already assumed I wasn't quite out of the reach of three letter agencies because I had to use a phone number to get started. Phones are essentially pwned by default and easily pwnable for the agencies.