I agree with your assessment that 'more of something bad' is not necessarily better. In addition it should be noted that the study relies on actigraphy, yet th

I agree with your assessment that 'more of something bad' is not necessarily better. In addition it should be noted that the study relies on actigraphy, yet the shortcomings of actigraphy are waved away. This doesn't mean we can get good before-after estimates, but they should not be compared to estimates from PSG.