> It has a border and a few buttons. What is every non-Apple tablet? The exact same thing. In terms of other hardware, tablets are far less varied than PCs > M

> It has a border and a few buttons. What is every non-Apple tablet? The exact same thing. In terms of other hardware, tablets are far less varied than PCs > Microsoft and Google don't have to tailor their operating systems to varied hardware -- in terms of interface, all tablets are the same. This seems to be the logic so often applied to Apple. 1) Assume only Apple endorsed features are important 2) Disregard all non-Apple endorsed features on competitors 3) Declare all competitors are just inferior copies of Apple devices The reality is that there are extremely useful features on the non-Apple tablets. While it certainly remains to be seen how much consumer interest they get, it's very premature to write them off. I especially think that Google has a great chance to differentiate with its online services - more so than on the phone.