3 ms·
Yes, this sounds short-sighted. They seem to be a mac user so I can only guess it might have to do with lack of expandability of the used hardware? I have two 1
by iforgotpassword 6y ago
Yes, this sounds short-sighted. They seem to be a mac user so I can only guess it might have to do with lack of expandability of the used hardware? I have two 12tb drives in my home server and 2tb offsite backup for important stuff (=photos and some documents). Scaling down photos never even crossed my mind.
- ValentineC 6y ago> They seem to be a mac user so I can only guess it might have to do with lack of expandability of the used hardware? More enthusiastic Mac-using photographers would probably invest in a consumer NAS like a Synology for expandable storage. It's also great for offloading videos and other large, infrequently-accessed files. Some Apple users these days also opt into paying for more storage for iCloud Photo Library. I personally think it's a great deal, since I can also get away with buying an iPhone with the lowest amount of built-in storage (saving ~$100 over the life of the phone), in exchange for paying $0.99/$2.99 more a month.
- BigBalli 6y agoYes, on a Mac and have multiple external hard drives for backup. It's not merely about saving space, I dislike the principle of "wasting".
- Jeff_Brown 6y agoIf it's a choice between wasting disk space or wasting your time?