3 ms·
You reply is some quotes, establishing that in two countries Signal was already blocked, and an exclamation. I fail to see how you reached your conclusion.
by brnt 6y ago
You reply is some quotes, establishing that in two countries Signal was already blocked, and an exclamation. I fail to see how you reached your conclusion.
- chaps 6y agoDo you really not see how the blanket banning of cryptocurrency and the blanket banning of signal itself isn't a tad bit of an indication that signal will get more blanket bans when combining the two? They're fundamentally saying that no inductive evidence exists despite clear inductive evidence existing. Seriously, what more do you want?
- brnt 6y agoBlanket banning of crypto is, as you wrote, limited to the usual suspects. In the EU it's treated like any other asset, my tax office here has been asking me to declare any, alongside (foreign) cash, banks, etc for years now. So no, more blanket banning does not seems likely to me.
- chaps 6y agoThe point of my post was to point out that their statement that there was no indication was wrong. Not sure what your mention of the EU has to do with anything. In any case, we'll see. My money's on it being a complete shit show two months from now.