2 ms·
Right, but at what point does some of the burden of making a website accessible fall on the screen reader application used by those with disabilities? Like, if
by DebtDeflation 6y ago
Right, but at what point does some of the burden of making a website accessible fall on the screen reader application used by those with disabilities? Like, if there's nothing technically preventing the screen reader from reading the website, it's just that the site does not do things the way the screen reader wants them to, why does the onus fall on the site owner?
- curryst 6y agoI presumed screen readers had some kind of standard in the way they interpreted things. The standard allows the user to choose which screen reader they want. Letting the screen readers interpret things however they want seems likely to end up in a situation like browsers. Horrible shims everywhere to handle the idiosyncracies of how each reader interprets things.