But the next follow-up question to what you said would be, why should we focus on only the risk of death to determine harm? E.g., what happens if I exercise and

But the next follow-up question to what you said would be, why should we focus on only the risk of death to determine harm? E.g., what happens if I exercise and drink a moderate amount of alcohol per week? I believe, AFAIK, I get worse results from that, and I would care about that wasted effort whether it raises my risk of death or not. I understand the logic of it, but I'm not super okay with saying that "causing no excess mortality" is somehow equivalent to "no effect". There are effects in statistics other than death, I think what you're saying means that mortality data alone is not enough to justify teetotalling.