Two rebuttals to Leibniz are "that was then, this is now", and "but this is special". Both are fluff until you answer the real question, which is "why are thing

Two rebuttals to Leibniz are "that was then, this is now", and "but this is special". Both are fluff until you answer the real question, which is "why are things the way they are"? It takes both humility and courage to engage with something you don't understand, but if you are curious, it is also deep fun.