Rust doesn't intend to prevent you from creating dangling pointers... if you want that functionality, use references. The reason this issue is particularly lik

Rust doesn't intend to prevent you from creating dangling pointers... if you want that functionality, use references. The reason this issue is particularly likely to hit is that it's the intersection of three things: (1) one of the very few times when people often need raw pointers when not writing very carefully inspected unsafe code is when calling functions across an FFI boundary, (2) C strings are represented by a char * pointer using a type (3) a Rust value that's created as a temporary will drop on the same line. (1) and (2) are how people can know it's almost always a bug when someone does this with a `CString`, whereas a lint would probably have a lot more false positives for something like a `Vec` (which is rarely passed to C directly since it doesn't understand it). Keep in mind that even something like borrowing a RefCell creates a temporary, so once you cast to a pointer and end the lifetime it came from it's very hard for the type system to track back the pointer you got to any particular deallocated temporary in an intelligent way. It pretty much has to be done on a case by case basis, I suspect (but maybe that could be improved--it is definitely the case, from a study someone did recently, that a large percentage of UB in unsafe Rust is due to destructors running early unexpectedly!).