Why didn’t they just put warning that claims in these podcasts are not verified? I don’t understand tech righteousness and superiority what other people can and

Why didn’t they just put warning that claims in these podcasts are not verified? I don’t understand tech righteousness and superiority what other people can and cannot listen. In this case, the thing sis already published, it’s already marked for mature audience. Why certain committees feel so superior of themselves that people cannot be allowed to listen some interviews? They even blocked coffee maker because his views on longevity is too controversial? Wtf?