4 ms·
I'm not sure you are aware that everybody that activates JS just to see this type of content (which can be done in a static html only manner) will be heavily di
by cookiengineer 6y ago
I'm not sure you are aware that everybody that activates JS just to see this type of content (which can be done in a static html only manner) will be heavily disappointed when they've loaded your page.
It's like waiting to load a WebGL demo of a damn teapot. Afterwards you have a negative impression, such as me now thinking of chadnauseam, that I now think has no effing clue about webdev if this person can't create two damn paragraphs without a JS framework.
If you throw a heavy JS framework on a website, make sure the content is at least as heavy. If the content is two paragraphs of text, why would you disappoint users so much when they visit from mobile?
- frosted-flakes 6y agoGatsby actually works extremely well for no-JS users. It is a static site generator, after all, that serves you raw HTML with a secondary JS payload. It's just that the author broke his website by setting the opacity to 0 on load so he could do a fade-in effect with JavaScript, even though there are much easier ways to do that in CSS. All the text is still there, just invisible.