3 ms·
So they appear to have mutually agreed to remove content to conform to the prevailing pressure to restrict public discourse to only politically correct content.
by cicero 5y ago
So they appear to have mutually agreed to remove content to conform to the prevailing pressure to restrict public discourse to only politically correct content. While it is certainly their right to make any business arrangement they want, it is distressing that open conversation continues to shrink in our world, whether it be through unilateral cancelation or mutual agreement for the sake of money.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- markdown 5y ago> it is distressing that open conversation continues to shrink in our world Are you sure about that? When has talk about Bigfoot, moon landing conspiracies, the government turning frogs gay, and other such nonsense been welcome in "open conversation"?
- nbardy 5y agoSince the dawn of time.
- markdown 5y agoNational Enquirer isn't "open conversation" lol.
- zero_deg_kevin 5y agoI suspect the point of contention here is that people expect their unsubstantiated nonsense to be taken seriously, treated with respect, and accepted by the general public.