4 ms·
And Rogan knew exactly who he was signing with (a risk-averse media company). Two parties voluntarily decided to do business according to some mutually agreeabl
by zero_deg_kevin 6y ago
And Rogan knew exactly who he was signing with (a risk-averse media company). Two parties voluntarily decided to do business according to some mutually agreeable terms. None of this should be surprising or outrageous to anyone...but, here we are.
- gherkinnn 6y agoAlso true. It’s a source of outrage that keeps on giving. Though I wish that more people were outraged at the fact that video podcasts are not done well in Spotify. Now that’s the real problem.
- cicero 6y agoSo they appear to have mutually agreed to remove content to conform to the prevailing pressure to restrict public discourse to only politically correct content. While it is certainly their right to make any business arrangement they want, it is distressing that open conversation continues to shrink in our world, whether it be through unilateral cancelation or mutual agreement for the sake of money.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- markdown 6y ago> it is distressing that open conversation continues to shrink in our world Are you sure about that? When has talk about Bigfoot, moon landing conspiracies, the government turning frogs gay, and other such nonsense been welcome in "open conversation"?
- nbardy 6y agoSince the dawn of time.
- markdown 6y agoNational Enquirer isn't "open conversation" lol.
- zero_deg_kevin 5y agoI suspect the point of contention here is that people expect their unsubstantiated nonsense to be taken seriously, treated with respect, and accepted by the general public.