33 ms·
no, the rational mistake you're making is assuming there is a safe side to fall on, and moreover defending that position. this kind of thinking is endemic to me
by clairity 6y ago
no, the rational mistake you're making is assuming there is a safe side to fall on, and moreover defending that position. this kind of thinking is endemic to mediopolitical rhetoric, and it's almost always incorrect. in real world conditions, there are multifactorial risks on all sides, and it's a multidimensional optimization problem. there's just no safe side. the obessiveness over cleaning and its ill effects just being one small element in that multidimensionalism.
we need to strive to make the optimal tradeoff, not the mediopolitically mediated safe choice, which we see backfire again and again in practice via unintended consequences, particularly by eroding trust in each other and our institutions, but in many other dimensions as well.
- dredmorbius 6y agoUnsupported presumptions of others' beliefs are exceeding fraught ground. That may be a logic you encounter in others. It is not mine. Hygiene practices haven't been harmful, hence, they're a safe choice. They weren't especially useful. As far as misallocated resources, the general disinformation and misinforation campaigns and amplification in various quarters has been vastly more significant.
- clairity 6y agomore chemicals, diversion, stress, and mistrust, to name just a few, are harmful, and none of those practices were useful.