5 ms·

Anyone who doesn't want higher wages or better working conditions isn't defining their self-interest very rationally. And anyone who doesn't believe the union i

Anyone who doesn't want higher wages or better working conditions isn't defining their self-interest very rationally. And anyone who doesn't believe the union is the best way to get there is probably being persuaded by anti-union propaganda rather than sound arguments.

ekianjo 6y ago
> Anyone who doesn't want higher wages or better working conditions isn't defining their self-interest very rationally. higher wages or better working conditions don't happen in a vacuum. Thinking it's a godsend or something is the definition of not thinking rationally.
deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
dbsmith83 6y ago
> And anyone who doesn't believe... Right, because no one has any relevant experiences which might influence their thoughts. You said anyone. You come across as incredibly condescending
- kethinov 6y ago
  Condescending is opposing giving low income people more money and better working conditions because of some abstract philosophical argument used to justify redefining self-interest in a totally bizarre way. People in this thread are all like, "Don't tell me giving someone food is in their self-interest! What if they want to starve?"
  - dbsmith83 6y ago
    You are framing the argument disingenuously. This isn't a simple formula where union = better. There are reasons why people don't think a union is in their self interest. Contrary to whatever you're parroting, there are actually people who have good reasons why they don't want a union--including things they have actually experienced. The fact that you can't possibly see the other side of it and can't even fathom an argument against it just shows how biased you are. The fact that you don't even think other people can make their own rational choice shows how condescending you are.
kcplate 6y ago
Perhaps if higher wages and better working conditions are the only items that define your self-interest. I suspect while those two items may be important or helpful, they are by far not the only factors that define my self interest. I have given up both willingly and much happier for it. Perhaps my happiness is not rational but it’s damn sure more important than money and whether or not I have a 1” or 2” standing mat under my feet.

ekianjo 6y ago

> Anyone who doesn't want higher wages or better working conditions isn't defining their self-interest very rationally. higher wages or better working conditions don't happen in a vacuum. Thinking it's a godsend or something is the definition of not thinking rationally.

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]

dbsmith83 6y ago

> And anyone who doesn't believe... Right, because no one has any relevant experiences which might influence their thoughts. You said anyone. You come across as incredibly condescending

kethinov 6y ago
Condescending is opposing giving low income people more money and better working conditions because of some abstract philosophical argument used to justify redefining self-interest in a totally bizarre way. People in this thread are all like, "Don't tell me giving someone food is in their self-interest! What if they want to starve?"
- dbsmith83 6y ago
  You are framing the argument disingenuously. This isn't a simple formula where union = better. There are reasons why people don't think a union is in their self interest. Contrary to whatever you're parroting, there are actually people who have good reasons why they don't want a union--including things they have actually experienced. The fact that you can't possibly see the other side of it and can't even fathom an argument against it just shows how biased you are. The fact that you don't even think other people can make their own rational choice shows how condescending you are.

kcplate 6y ago

Perhaps if higher wages and better working conditions are the only items that define your self-interest. I suspect while those two items may be important or helpful, they are by far not the only factors that define my self interest. I have given up both willingly and much happier for it. Perhaps my happiness is not rational but it’s damn sure more important than money and whether or not I have a 1” or 2” standing mat under my feet.