4 ms·
Throw the mouse out and just use emacs!
by smithza 6y ago
Throw the mouse out and just use emacs!
- gumby 6y agoAs a bonus you get more fine hand exercise -- on both hands!
- TeMPOraL 6y agoBe sure to remap Caps Lock to work as CTRL, or else you may overtrain your left pinkie.
- monsieurbanana 6y agoOr to alt, as the Flying Spaghetti Monster intended. Earlier keyboards had ctrl next to the space, which is why it's such a used modifier key (thumb is stronger than pinky, and is quite easy to use both left and right keys). Not that I personally do that, I'm too used to ctrl mapped to caps lock. If I could go back in time to before I started using emacs though... I would learn emacs with vim bindings. As a more general recommendation, getting used to both right and left control (whatever it's mapped to) is a huge ergonomic improvement. When you need to use Ctrl with a key in the left side of the keyboard, use right ctrl, and left ctrl when using a key in the right side. This avoid having to crumple your hand to reach, eg., ctrl+a.
- throwkeep 6y agoTempting. For those who have never used emacs or vim, how long would it take to get up to speed?
- smithza 6y agoIf you are seriously interested (which I highly recommend) just throw yourself into it. In the case of emacs, effort put in is directly correlated to efficiency gained. I was proficient in basic text/code editing in a few hours and incrementally tried to shoehorn most editing/scripting problems to be solved with emacs. There is an emacs wiki[0], the tutorial built into emacs[1], and a stack exchange network (mostly for questions related to emacs lisp which you will want to tinker in pretty soon after using the tool) [2]. Just a note, emacs could be a full desktop experience, supporting reading/writing email, web browsing, document browsing (pdfs, html, etc.), picture viewing, text editing, automation guru, etc etc etc. Some caution against some of these features but I use it mainly for text editing and automation support. It has a very robust keyboard-macro-recording tool, for example. [0] https://www.emacswiki.org/ https://www.emacswiki.org/ [1] https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EmacsTutorial https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EmacsTutorial [2] https://emacs.stackexchange.com/ https://emacs.stackexchange.com/ Additional reading [3] https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/refcards/pdf/refcard.pdf https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/refcards/pdf/refcard.pdf [4] https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs
- karatinversion 6y agoI’ve found the emacs manual to be superior to the emacs wiki pretty much always (three months into my emacs journey here), fwiw.