3 ms·
I think the intent of this message was to admit failure internally only. It was a corporate email, not a press release. There's a fertile grey area between the
by mechanical_fish 18y ago
I think the intent of this message was to admit failure internally only. It was a corporate email, not a press release.
There's a fertile grey area between the top-secret internal email and the press release, ranging from deliberately dropping a copy of your "top-secret" email on the floor of a journalist's office to deliberately sending the email to a bunch of people who are known to be bad at keeping secrets.
Apple's pretty good at keeping secrets. When something leaks out of Apple within 24 hours I tend to assume that it had some assistance.
I think the diplomatic wording is another clue that Jobs, at the very least, doesn't care that this email got out.
- boucher 18y agoThe way Apple keeps secrets is by keeping information strictly need to know. Anything that gets sent out to the whole company is usually leaked pretty quickly.
- noonespecial 18y agoAgreed: There is no profanity. I'd take this as evidence that Jobs had nothing at all to do with its writing! There should be a name for pseudo-press-releases that are disguised as "internal memos".