4 ms·

I don't understand your core point: why is it inherently wrong to attempt to augment the brain? It seems like a purely instinctual response. Is it God's will f

I don't understand your core point: why is it inherently wrong to attempt to augment the brain? It seems like a purely instinctual response. Is it God's will for paralyzed people to remain unable to interact with the world, and live the rest of their lives in misery? If we have a way to do a lot of good for a lot of people, isn't it inherently immoral to not develop the technology further?

the_dripper 6y ago
youre right, but I fear a future where such techonolgy can be abused. I haven't carfully considered all the positives such technology will bring into our world. I was starteled by the potential of abuse and how far technology has come.