4 ms·
> You seem to suggest those people train everybody around them to change behavior. Yes, I would prefer that as well. Instead of indefinitely (and rather defens
by js8 6y ago
> You seem to suggest those people train everybody around them to change behavior.
Yes, I would prefer that as well. Instead of indefinitely (and rather defensively) change the names of things that might be deemed offensive, educate people that there are contexts in which they shouldn't give in to their infantile impulses.
I mean, doctors can do it.. SW engineers too, probably.
- tlringer 6y agoWe are mostly researchers, so this is not so much a language we use as our life's work. This means we talk about it a _lot_, including in public. It's not just about people at work making jokes; it's also about what happens when you leave work and mention what you do in public as a force of habit. It's pretty awful to expect all of us, especially the women in the community, to have to police the behavior of every stranger we encounter who hears us say that we are Coq experts or something similar, and uses that to make jokes at our expense or harass us.
- Rule35 6y agoA guy I work with has 'balls' in his name. Yes, he and management expect people to keep their mouths shut. Anyways, yes we could require him to change his name because it's distracting. That would be one thing to do. It's the solution suggested by people in this thread...
- tlringer 6y agoIf you can't see the many differences between those situations, I don't feel like we will have a productive conversation.
- Rule35 6y agoBoth involve expecting people to respect foreigners and their language. There's a difference of magnitude, in that one is a guy's name and the other is a guy's project's name. But no, I don't see a fundamental difference.