2 ms·
Yeah... I'm still trying to figure out what the illegal part was. Maybe they used the Nike logo on a web site promoting the shoes? Or maybe they repositioned
by TheDudeMan 6y ago
Yeah... I'm still trying to figure out what the illegal part was. Maybe they used the Nike logo on a web site promoting the shoes? Or maybe they repositioned the Nike logo on the shoe? Just having the logo on the shoe wouldn't be a problem. The logo was put there by Nike.
- habitue 6y agoIf you materially alter the item, in a way that would surprise the consumer expecting an item with that trademark, it can be a problem. The example legal eagle on youtube gives is a sunglass manufacturer with special protective lenses. A reseller replaced the lenses, and a customer would be expecting the special lenses when they bought them with that trademark. So the court decided that change was material and found against the reseller.