3 ms·
It was one of several problems I have had with bhyve. When I tried, bhyve would fail to run about half of the linux distributions I thew at it. Also, the more
by __turbobrew__ 6y ago
It was one of several problems I have had with bhyve. When I tried, bhyve would fail to run about half of the linux distributions I thew at it.
Also, the more worry thing is that the project don’t appear to have any QA testing for linux guests. How is it that a bug which caused ubuntu and redhat guests to deadlock on boot got through the release cycle?
If there was any sort of QA testing for linux guests the bug would have been caught.
So my problem wasn’t necessarily the bug, but the apparent lack of QA processes.
- ggm 6y agoI'm running debian and ubuntu, freebsd 11, 12, 13. I've run three variants of debian since sid. You pointed to ix systems, which are IIRC frozen on 11, when Freebsd is in release cycle for 13. Who should be doing the QA here? Ix or FreeBSD?
- magicalhippo 6y agoMy TrueNAS Core install is saying "FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p3". My main issue with Bhyve is the lackluster networking performance, getting only ~1.5Gbps from VM guest to VM host (tested with iperf3) on fairly beefy machine. This really limits the usefulness of NFS shares.