3 ms·
> git was 2005 I'm not sure I'd consider git to be "low-hanging fruit"
by saghm 6y ago
> git was 2005
I'm not sure I'd consider git to be "low-hanging fruit"
- setr 6y agoGiven that Torvalds apparently went from design to implementation in 3 days, and 2 months later had it officially managing the kernel, I wouldn’t say it was particularly high-hanging.
- danesparza 6y agoPretty sure Git was a side project so that Linus could manage Linux source code like he wanted.