4 ms·
While your conclusion is largely correct, it doesn't follow from your premises: UTF-16 is just a way to encode, but its brain-damaged surrogate pair mechanism v
by a1369209993 6y ago
While your conclusion is largely correct, it doesn't follow from your premises: UTF-16 is just a way to encode, but its brain-damaged surrogate pair mechanism very much did get baked into Unicode (namely, high and low surrogate code points D800-DFFF).