> Nicotine is ... > Smoking has ... Neither I, nor anyone in this thread, has contested the existence of evidence to support this claim. > "Very plausible" h

> Nicotine is ... > Smoking has ... Neither I, nor anyone in this thread, has contested the existence of evidence to support this claim. > "Very plausible" here means ... Why does "plausible" not suffice? > I can't imagine anyone would see "very plausible" and think the explanation should be accepted without investigation. That's just not what that phrase means. I didn't suggest otherwise.